I’ll tell you what, sitting
through a Tiger Woods press
conference isn’t what it used to be.
Back in his heyday, the
media would assemble early, because seats in Tiger’s audience were at a premium, even at those big-tent major
championships.A back door to the
media center would open and in Tiger
would sweep, trailed by an entourage worthy of a hip-hop mogul: agents, swing
coaches, family, friends, security and at least a couple of people whose
purpose and connection were anybody’s guess.
Tiger
would take his place at the head table and face the media like the royal family
looking out from that balcony at Will
and Kate’s wedding.When stirrings in the room settled down,
his agent, Mark Steinberg, over in
the corner, would offer a slight nod to the interview moderator as a signal to
commence.
No matter what the event
– the U.S. Open, the PGA Championship or some lesser event
that he was gracing with his presence – it was merely the stage for Tiger’s superhuman heroics.Even at Ryder Cups, where Tiger
would file in with his teammates, it will still pretty much about him.We knew that.He knew that.It was Tiger’s world and we were just living in it, watching in awe,
grateful for a seat.
Once the press conference
began, Tiger would make an opening
statement but he never said anything...Blah,
blah, blah.
Even when the floor was
opened to questions, Tiger never
said anything provocative or revealing.But he was so smooth in saying nothing, you didn’t much notice until you
sat down at your laptop and started going over your notes.Is
there one usable quote here?
But it was okay, because Tiger had that aura of invincibility,
that ability to leave us shaking our heads in amazement.He did his talking with his golf
clubs.That gave you all the material you needed.
Cut to now.
At Aronimink, Tiger didn’t so much sweep into the press conference as he limped
in the side door.The entourage is
smaller, down to agent Mark Steinberg,
who recently got axed from IMG; and Tiger’s
spokesman, Glenn Greenspan, who left
Augusta National for this job
shortly before the Tiger Apocalypse.
Tiger
press conferences are few and far between these days, and the audiences are
smaller.Some of it has to do with
the shrinking of the media due to the economy.More of it has to do with Tiger’s downfall, his disgrace, his
loss of popularity – and, of course, with the fact that he is not winning
and not even playing.
The first question at Aronimink was
about when he would return to competitive golf.The British
Open in two weeks?
Tiger
didn’t know.Last time, he came
back too soon and he ended up quitting after nine holes at the Players Championship.This time, he is taking no chances,
taking his doctors’ advice, setting no timetables.He’ll come back when he’s ready and no
sooner, whenever that turns out to be.
He still tries to look and
talk and project like the Tiger of
old, but it’s not working.Very
unconvincing.It’s as if the air
has gone out of him. He seems
sapped, scared.There was something
approaching sadness in the room, like a funeral.
As I sat there, I couldn’t
help but think the whole thing would be more interesting and more productive if
Tiger had had to answer the "thought
bubble" questions hanging over people’s heads, not the questions they actually
asked.
Say, Tiger, did you see that latest poll where a
majority of golf fans think your career is toast?
Does it bother you knowing that every 20-something on
Tour these days thinks he can kick your ass?
One of the financial magazines says you’re still
making $70 million a year in endorsements.I don’t see it.Other than
Nike and EA, who is left?
Ah, do you ever lie in bed at night and ask yourself,
"How did I manage to screw up my life this bad?"
A couple of hours before Tiger’s press conference, I bumped into
a powerful agent who represents several top players.Quickly, the talk turned to Tiger.We shook our heads, neither of us able
to believe the gory details of one of the most spectacular downfalls in the
history of sports.
"The thing is, I don’t think
Tiger or Mark (Steinberg) understands how much the world has changed since
he hit that fire hydrant," said the agent. "I don’t think they get it.But believe me, the world has changed."
It has, and it’s a shame for
Tiger, for golf and for golf fans.
I try to keep MyPhillyGolf free of
politics.With all the mind-numbing
debate and name-calling that goes on between liberals and conservatives in the
country these days, I figure this website ought to be one place where you can
take refuge.You come here for
golf, not politics.
But then somebody emailed me a link to this column
on Townhall.com, a conservative
website.Geez.
It didn’t come as news to me that most of the
guys on the PGA Tour are conservative.Talk to one of them for five minutes and you’re likely to hear the
gospel according to Rush Lumbaugh or Sean
Hannity.
Even the Tour pros who grew up cushy, living
the country club life in the suburbs, tend to see themselves as lone wolves,
survivors, guys who eat only what they kill, metaphorically speaking. Unlike
most other pro sports, Tour pros don’t get signing bonuses or no-cut contracts.
Still, I was a little surprised to read that
the comments of the unnamed pro quoted in this column.He worries that Golf Channel is going to be influenced, infiltrated, infected by he
sees as the too-liberal mothership, NBC.
Here’s columnist Douglas MacKinnon quoting an unnamed Tour pro:
"I will speak for myself here. As a
conservative, one of the things that has most bothered me is The Golf Channel
partnering with ultraliberal NBC. CNBC is dominated by the liberal agenda,
MSNBC is the liberal agenda and the NBC-controlled Weather Channel is driven by
the religion of global warming and believes in smearing all who don't bow down
to the 'settled science' of global warming. And now The Golf Channel is being
big-footed by those with a liberal agenda, and no one seems to care.
"So now professional golf, where at least a
majority of the U.S. players still believe in traditional values, is falling
under the same control of the far left much like the entertainment world, the
mainstream media and our colleges and universities. It's a disgrace, but many
golfers are simply afraid to speak up.
The pro is not
finished:
"Now The Golf Channel
is using the NBC-employed or -approved likes of Jimmy Roberts, John Feinstein
or Tim Rosaforte — nonathletes
that many of us believe have a liberal agenda or openly espouse their liberal
beliefs or allegiance to the Democratic party."
Okay, I have no idea what Jimmy Roberts’ politics are, and I don’t
think anybody else does either, at least not from watching what he does and
says on NBC and Golf Channel.
As for John Feinstein and Tim Rosaforte,
if the unnamed Tour pro doesn’t like them, don’t blame NBC. Both were
working for Golf Channel long before Comcast, which already owned
Golf Channel, bought NBC and joined them at the hip.
I know Feinstein and Rosaforte
and I can tell you that both of them are smart enough to know that viewers of Golf
Channel, like visitors to MyPhillyGolf,
aren’t tuning in for their personal takes on politics.
Smartest of all in that regard is Philadelphia’s own Brian Roberts,
chairman of Comcast and therefore the boss of NBC and Golf
Channel.Word is, last Sunday,
when NBC aired the package with the edited version of the Pledge of
Allegiance, Roberts was not happy and he was quickly on the phone trying
to find out who approved this bone-headed move.
"Traditional values?" How about "Freedom of speech?" If this conservative golfer doesn’t like NBC,CNBC, MSNBC or even The Weather Channel, then don’t watch them. Geez....The Golf Channel has already had that doofus Rush Limbaugh on Hank Haney’s show. Maybe Glenn Beck will be the next politico there. That should be fair and balanced enough for him.
Steve
[6/24/2011 3:10:52 PM]
Even if the whiner were right about the liberal bias, surely there are worse things than being, Heaven forbid, liberal.
If you missed last night’s premier preview of Feherty on Golf Channel, you’ve
got another chance to watch it tonight from 9-10 p.m., when it officially
debuts.It’s worth checking out.
For candid, insightful golf commentary, Brandel Chamblee has overtaken Johnny Miller in my book.But when it comes to wit, humor and
entertainment value, nobody on the scene today can touch David Feherty.
Except for the over-the-top intros that have
the star acting and looking goofy, Fehertyis the freshest thing on Golf
Channel.In the span of a
half-hour, the CBS and Golf Channel analyst is funny, brutally
candid, somber, loosey-goosey and reverential.
Most of the premier episode is devoted to Feherty
interviewing and essentially kneeling at the alter of Lee Trevino.That’s
okay, because Trevino is also an
engaging character, with a great story to explore.Besides, during his prime, Trevino never quite got the attention and
respect he deserved, laboring in the shadows of Jack Nicklaus, Tom Watson
and the still competitive Arnold Palmer.Feherty readily admits that he is perhaps Trevino’s biggest fan.
For years, Feherty was clever but largely
unseen foot soldier for CBS, spouting
hilarious one-liners as he walked the fairways.Then, out of the blue, the funnyman revealed
that he had spent years hiding the fact that he was a drug addict, a barely functional
alcoholic, not to mention fighting a losing battle to depression.Those close to him surely knew,
but not the rest of us.
We didn’t find out until after the fact, when Feherty sobered
up, lost what must have been 40 pounds, grew a goatee that makes him look like a
smiling Lucifer – and reintroduced himself as a more complicated and
compelling figure.
These days,Feherty can still do goofball quite handily when
he wants to, but he can turn on a dime, growing serious as he lays bare his
demons to the point you feel awkward watching from the distance and safety of
your easy chair.
When I heard the news that he was a reformed
alcoholic, I immediately recalled one night several years ago at Masters.Each year during Masters week, CBS rents
a big house with a sprawling yard in the Augusta suburbs; one night of the
tournament, they throw a party for the media, network types, golf officials and
all manner of movers and shakers.
One year, a small cluster of us writer types were
out in the yard, sipping beers and shooting the bull, when Feherty walked up and joined the
conversation.He probably had a
beer in his hand, I don’t recall, but he certainly didn’t appear to be drunk.
Then, for whatever reason, he launched into an
story about a well-known player (not Tiger) that was so out-of-school and
raunchy that it made a bunch of hardly prudish middle-aged sportswriters
blanche.I remember thinking the CBS brass would croak if they knew he
was out working the party with stories like that.
A couple of years later, when he went public with
his problems, it all made sense.Feherty must’ve
been in the tank that night, even if he hid it well.
These days, Feherty is a different guy.I’ve got to believe he has removed that
story from his repertoire.Today,
he would shake his head at the embarrassment of it all.
Feherty was a far better golfer
during his career than he lets on today – self-deprecation is part of his
shtick; he’s a hell of a golf commentator now, and he’s a polished and funny
writer.He’s also got a weekly show
of his own that will likely get better by the week.
Watching Rory McIlroy
rewrite the U.S. Open record book
and establish himself as the new darling of golf, it was hard not to wonder
whether Tiger Woods was watching.
Was Tiger at home, lying on the couch, with his bum leg elevated,
staring into some 70-inch plasma high-def, knowing
that millions of his old fans have found
a new fave – a likeable young fresh face, not
unlike Tiger in 1997, when he blew
minds as he blew away the field in the Masters
by 12 shots?
Was Tiger lying there gnashing his teeth, aching for the moment when he
is healthy again and able to get back out there to re-establish himself as the
king of the golfing jungle?
Or was he sweating bullets.He’s 35 now, not the kid he once was, not
the same guy that used to cast the long shadow as he strode to the first
tee.With McIlroy’s herculean victory at Congressional, all four major
championship trophies are now held by 20-somethings.Rory
McIlroy was 8 when Tiger won the ’97 Masters;
Jason Day, the other superstar
aborning, was 9.
But as the day wore on and Johnny Miller and the NBC team hailed McIlroy’s amazing
performance at Congressional, my
curiosity about Tiger was eventually
supplanted by concern that the media is already hailing this kid is the new Tiger.
McIlroy is obviously a big, big talent, and a terrific and humble young man
with a very bright future, but he has won exactly one major.He hasn’t lost sight of that and neither
should we.Let’s not saddle him
with impossible expectations.Let’s
not set him up for failure, if he doesn’t begin winning majors at the rate of a
young Tiger.
The next major is the British Open, in July.You don’t have to be a genius to know
what the story line will be:Can
this budding superstar deliver again?Is he as good as we thought? If Tiger
is in the field, the British Open
will be billed as a showdown between the old star and the new kid on the block
– i.e. Old Tiger vs. New Tiger.
For the media, the
temptation is impossible to resist.They need a story to tell.Let’s just hope McIlroy
doesn’t turn out to be collateral damage.
This is certainly nothing new. How many young golfers who won majors or big tournaments in the early 1980s were dubbed "The Next Nicklaus"? Hal Sutton and Jeff Sluman come to mind. Both had nice careers, but fell far short of expectations. I agree with you Joe, let’s let Rory be Rory...
How about a major tip of the visor to Michael Tobiason Jr., the local club
pro, for his first-round 75 in the U.S. Open at Congressional CC.Okay, he’s not on the leaderboard, but
what he did Thursday was huge.Scorecard.
When Tobiason,
27, from Wilmington, a teaching pro at Applecross CC in Downingtown, told me the other day
that he had never been to a PGA Tour
event, let alone played in one, I
silently winced on the other end of the phone.Teeing it up in the U.S. Open, arguably the grandest stage in golf, for your first
big-time tournament is to suffocating pressure.
Having seen club pro after club pro shoot 85 in
the same situation, then bury their face in their hands in the locker room, humiliated,
I fully expected Tobiason to wilt under
the pressure at Congressional.To
his credit, Tobiason did no such
thing.
As I write this, shortly after 6 p.m., a bunch
of golfers are still on the course for the first round.Tobiason
is currently T-96th and looking better all the time.By the end of the day, he could be
hovering around the cut line.
I don’t know about you but I’m pulling for Michael Tobiason.
How about a major tip of the visor to Michael Tobiason Jr., the local club
pro, for his first-round 75 in the U.S. Open at Congressional CC.Okay, he’s not on the leaderboard, but
what he did Thursday was huge.Scorecard.
When Tobiason,
27, from Wilmington, a teaching pro at Applecross CC in Downingtown, told me the other day
that he had never been to a PGA Tour
event, let alone played in one, I
silently winced on the other end of the phone.Teeing it up in the U.S. Open, arguably the grandest stage in golf, for your first
big-time tournament is to suffocating pressure.
Having seen club pro after club pro shoot 85 in
the same situation, then bury their face in their hands in the locker room, humiliated,
I fully expected Tobiason to wilt under
the pressure at Congressional.To
his credit, Tobiason did no such
thing.
As I write this, shortly after 6 p.m., a bunch
of golfers are still on the course for the first round.Tobiason
is currently T-96th and looking better all the time.By the end of the day, he could be
hovering around the cut line.
I don’t know about you but I’m pulling for Michael Tobiason.
In Texas, they have a description for guys who
look and act like authentic cowboys and ranchers but in reality, aren’t: All hat, no cattle.
Yesterday, I played 18 holes behind golf’s
answer to that: All routine, no game.
No kidding, to look at the one guy in the
threesome ahead of us, you’d swear he must have been a PGA Tour pro.He was all decked out in a form-fitting
shirt and a pair of those tight nylon-looking pants favored by so many European
Tour players.His visor was pulled
down low, with his deliberately mussed-up hair sticking out the top in all
directors, making him look vaguely like Fredrik
Jacobson.Of course, the look
was finished off by a week’s worth of stubble.
From a distance, judging from his swing, you’d
figure he was a decent player.From
his routine, you’d figure he had to be no worse than a scratch player, more
likely some kind of touring pro.He
clearly took golf very seriously.
I mean, on every shot and every putt, he had a
full, minute-long routine, which he painstakingly repeated over and over.It was the kind of routine one can only
develop from watching hours and hours and hours of golf on TV.
On every shot, this guy would stand behind the
ball, eying his line or the projected flight ball of the ball.He’d do a false start or two, like
Sean O’Hair, then he’d step into the
shot and take a couple of full, careful practice swings.Finally, he’d look up once or twice,
dialing in on his target.
It was all very understandable and mesmerizing,
right up to the point that he would lay sod, or smash a pull-yanked OB left, or
foozle another stone-cold top.
When he would hit another crappy shot, which he
did pretty much every shot we saw, his head would drop in disappointment and
befuddlement, and he would look to his playing partners for some
explanation.How could such a
perfectly calibrated swing by such a skilled player as himself have produced
such a rancid result?
Hey, you can pull that off once or twice a
round, but after every shot?
My friend Tim and I, who were in a twosome,
first noticed the guy on the second or third hole, because we were waiting on
every shot.After watching him
chunk a 75-yard approach shot into the marsh, Tim said, "I think this guy
thinks he’s a better player than he is."
With all the waiting time on our hands, and to
amuse ourselves, we began to watch him more closely. By the 5th
hole, we were referring to him simply as Tour
Player.
On one hole, he pulled his tee shot into the
trees left of the fairway.That was
followed by an exhaustive examination of his recovery options, like something
you’d expect to witness in the final pairing of the U.S. Open on Sunday.Naturally, he topped his next shot,
advancing the ball perhaps 20 yards; his third shot appeared headed OB left.
Next hole: tee shot OB right.
At the 8th, a par 3, Tour Player
once again laid sod, sending his tee ball into the deep junk.He dropped on the forward tee, then
plunked his 3rd shot into the front bunker, needing two tepid
efforts to escape the sand; that was followed by a three-putt – a stylish
quad by my count.
Believe me when I say that none of the carnage
dissuaded Tour Player from an excruciating repetition of his routine on each
shot. Toward the end of the round, Tim’s and my impatience with Tour Player had
turned into enjoying his comedy of errors play out.How bad could it get?How bad could he get?
After the round, as we were head for the
parking car, Tour Player walked by with his bag slung over his back.It was all I could do to resist saying,
"Yo, bro, do us all a favor and watch less golf on
TV."
couldn’t agree more - I belong to a small private club in Chester County and see this all the time. I would add that etiquette and common courtesy have taken a back seat to look good first play good second.
what happened to letting people play through? i feel like slow players get offended when the group behind them asks to play through. really? you can play as slow as you want so long as you don’t affect the group behind you. it’s flat out rude to sit there and make the group behind you wait as you stand over a 260 yd shot into a par 5 with your 3 wood that you have 1 out 10000 odds of hitting on or near the green. Just hit, please. you will make the game more enjoyable for yourself and others.
no wonder the game is suffering. no one wants to spend 5+ hrs on the course. it’s a horrible epidemic only made worse by watching tour pro’s creep at a snails pace looking over a three foot putt.
Steve
[6/6/2011 5:20:01 AM]
My father always said that if you can’t play well, dress well.
Tim
[6/6/2011 5:10:33 AM]
It was entertainment!
SteveMG
[6/5/2011 11:16:18 PM]
I’ve been lucky never to be in a slow group. (Usually I get paired up with random people.) Just today I was stuck behind a slow group. It took awhile before I could get a chance too look ahead of them and I finally saw that there was noone in sight. I was so furious I walked off my green and up to their tee box and asked them if they could play the last two holes in under 45 minutes. They did! Odder still, the group that was behind us couldn’t keep up with us in spite of the excruciating pace we were making. At one point the other cart went back a hole to pick up a club and still they didn’t catch up. Is it too much just to keep up with the group in front of you? FWIW, I HATE playing through. And if I’m on a crowded course, I will refuse somebody who asks.
fran21356
[6/5/2011 5:33:16 PM]
That’s a riot to read, but so stinking frustrating to live through especially on a hot day. We’ve all had those experiences. You want people to enjoy themselves on the course but at the same time you want them to play like they realize they aren’t the only people on the course. Plum Bob square pants lives! Later at the 19th hole he transforms into Buzz Light beer.